Clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in patients with an ejection fraction > 35% estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator prolongs survival and improves quality of life in advanced heart failure. Traditionally, patients with ejection fraction > 35 estimated by echocardiography have been excluded. We assessed the prognostic impact of this therapy in a group of patients with severely depressed systolic function as assessed by echocardiography but with an ejection fraction > 35% as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients admitted for decompensated heart failure between 2004 and 2011. The patients were in functional class II-IV, with a QRS ≥ to 120 ms, ejection fraction ≤ 35% estimated by echocardiography, and a cardiac magnetic resonance study. We included all patients (n=103) who underwent device implantation for primary prevention. Ventricular arrhythmia, all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure were considered major cardiac events. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to systolic function assessed by magnetic resonance. RESULTS: The 2 groups showed similar improvements in functional class and ejection fraction at 6 months. We found a nonsignificant trend toward a higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with systolic function ≤ 35% at long-term follow-up. The presence of a pattern of necrosis identified patients with a worse prognosis for ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator leads to a similar clinical benefit in patients with an ejection fraction ≤ 35% or > 35% estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance. Analysis of the pattern of late gadolinium enhancement provides additional information on arrhythmic risk and long-term prognosis.

Beneficio clínico de la terapia de resincronización cardiaca con desfibrilador para pacientes con fracción de eyección > 35 por ciento por resonancia magnética / Clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in patients with an ejection fraction > 35 percent estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance

Introducción y objetivos. La terapia de resincronización cardiaca con desfibrilador aumenta la supervivencia y mejora la calidad de vida en insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada. Tradicionalmente, se ha excluido a los pacientes con fracción de eyección > 35% calculada por ecocardiografía. Evaluamos el impacto pronóstico de dicha terapia en un grupo de pacientes con disfunción sistólica grave por ecocardiografía pero con fracción de eyección > 35% por resonancia magnética cardiaca. Métodos. Se analizaron los ingresos por insuficiencia cardiaca entre 2004 y 2011 en clase funcional II - IV , QRS >= 120 ms, fracción de eyección por ecocardiografía <= 35% y estudio de resonancia magnética cardiaca según protocolo local. Se incluyó a los pacientes (n = 103) con implante de dispositivo en prevención primaria. Se registró la incidencia de arritmias ventriculares, reingreso por insuficiencia cardiaca y mortalidad total. La muestra se dividió según la función sistólica por resonancia magnética fuera <= 35% o > 35%. Resultados. Ambos grupos mostraron mejoras comparables en clase funcional y fracción de eyección a los 6 meses. Se encontró una tendencia no significativa hacia mayor mortalidad total entre los pacientes con fracción de eyección <= 35% en el seguimiento a largo plazo. Al dividir la muestra por función sistólica y patrón de realce, encontramos que la presencia de necrosis identificaba a los pacientes con peor pronóstico de arritmias ventriculares y mortalidad total. Conclusiones. La terapia de resincronización cardiaca con desfibrilador proporcionó un beneficio clínico similar a los pacientes con función sistólica por resonancia resonancia magnética cardiaca <=35% y > 35%. El patrón de realce tardío de gadolinio aporta información adicional sobre riesgo arrítmico y pronóstico a largo plazo de estos pacientes (AU)

Introduction and objectives. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator prolongs survival and improves quality of life in advanced heart failure. Traditionally, patients with ejection fraction > 35 estimated by echocardiography have been excluded. We assessed the prognostic impact of this therapy in a group of patients with severely depressed systolic function as assessed by echocardiography but with an ejection fraction > 35% as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. Methods. We analyzed consecutive patients admitted for decompensated heart failure between 2004 and 2011. The patients were in functional class II-IV, with a QRS >= to 120 ms, ejection fraction <= 35% estimated by echocardiography, and a cardiac magnetic resonance study. We included all patients (n=103) who underwent device implantation for primary prevention. Ventricular arrhythmia, all-cause mortality and readmission for heart failure were considered major cardiac events. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to systolic function assessed by magnetic resonance. Results. The 2 groups showed similar improvements in functional class and ejection fraction at 6 months. We found a nonsignificant trend toward a higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients with systolic function <= 35% at long-term follow-up. The presence of a pattern of necrosis identified patients with a worse prognosis for ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in both groups. Conclusions. We conclude that cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator leads to a similar clinical benefit in patients with an ejection fraction <= 35% or > 35% estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance. Analysis of the pattern of late gadolinium enhancement provides additional information on arrhythmic risk and long-term prognosis (AU)

Diagnóstico etiológico de la disfunción ventricular izquierda con tomografía computarizada: comparación con coronariografía y cardiorresonancia / Etiological diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction: computed tomography compared with coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance

Introducción y objetivos. Evaluar la capacidad de la tomografía computarizada con multidetectores en el diagnóstico de la disfunción ventricular izquierda de origen coronario y valorar su exactitud diagnóstica comparándola con la combinación de coronariografía invasiva y resonancia magnética. Métodos. Se estudió a 40 pacientes consecutivos con disfunción ventricular izquierda de origen no filiado mediante coronariografía invasiva y resonancia con contraste. A todos ellos se les realizó además un estudio de tomografía computarizada con multidetectores incluyendo presencia de calcio coronario y su cuantificación, coronariografía y valoración tisular del miocardio. Resultados. La sensibilidad y la especificidad de la presencia de calcio coronario para identificar la disfunción ventricular izquierda de origen coronario fueron del 100 y el 31% respectivamente. Si se considera un score de calcio por Agatston>100, la especificidad sube al 58% manteniendo la sensibilidad del 100%. Los valores de sensibilidad y especificidad de la coronariografía por tomografía computarizada con multidetectores fueron del 100 y el 96% respectivamente; para la identificación de áreas de necrosis en la adquisición precoz, del 57 y el 100% y en la adquisición tardía, del 84 y el 96%. Para identificar a los pacientes coronarios con necrosis, la sensibilidad y la especificidad fueron del 92 y el 100% respectivamente. Conclusiones. De todas las herramientas diagnósticas disponibles en tomografía computarizada con multidetectores, la coronariografía es la que muestra mayor exactitud diagnóstica para determinar el origen coronario de la disfunción ventricular. La combinación del estudio coronariográfico y el estudio tisular del miocardio tras el contraste permite obtener en un solo examen información similar a la de la combinación de cateterismo y resonancia con contraste (AU)

Introduction and objectives. To evaluate the capability of multidetector computed tomography to diagnose the coronary etiology of left ventricular dysfunction compared with using invasive coronary angiography and magnetic resonance. Methods. Forty consecutive patients with left ventricular dysfunction of uncertain etiology underwent invasive coronary angiography and contrast magnetic resonance. All patients were evaluated with multidetector computed tomography including coronary calcium presence and score, noninvasive coronary angiography, and myocardial tissue assessment. Results. The sensitivity and specificity of the presence of coronary calcium to identify left ventricular dysfunction was 100% and 31%, respectively. If an Agatston calcium score of >100 is taken, specificity increases to 58% with sensitivity still 100%. Sensitivity and specificity for coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography was 100% and 96%, respectively; for identifying necrosis in contrast acquisition it was 57% and 100%, respectively; and in late acquisition, 84% and 96%, respectively. To identify coronary ventricular dysfunction with necrosis, the sensitivity and specificity was 92% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions. Of all the diagnostic tools available in multidetector computed tomography, coronary angiography is the most accurate in determining the coronary origin of left ventricular dysfunction. A combination of coronary angiography and myocardial tissue study after contrast allows a single test to obtain similar information compared with the combination of invasive coronary angiography and contrast magnetic resonance (AU)

Etiological diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction: computed tomography compared with coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the capability of multidetector computed tomography to diagnose the coronary etiology of left ventricular dysfunction compared with using invasive coronary angiography and magnetic resonance. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with left ventricular dysfunction of uncertain etiology underwent invasive coronary angiography and contrast magnetic resonance. All patients were evaluated with multidetector computed tomography including coronary calcium presence and score, noninvasive coronary angiography, and myocardial tissue assessment. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the presence of coronary calcium to identify left ventricular dysfunction was 100% and 31%, respectively. If an Agatston calcium score of >100 is taken, specificity increases to 58% with sensitivity still 100%. Sensitivity and specificity for coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography was 100% and 96%, respectively; for identifying necrosis in contrast acquisition it was 57% and 100%, respectively; and in late acquisition, 84% and 96%, respectively. To identify coronary ventricular dysfunction with necrosis, the sensitivity and specificity was 92% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Of all the diagnostic tools available in multidetector computed tomography, coronary angiography is the most accurate in determining the coronary origin of left ventricular dysfunction. A combination of coronary angiography and myocardial tissue study after contrast allows a single test to obtain similar information compared with the combination of invasive coronary angiography and contrast magnetic resonance.

Taquicardia ventricular polimórfica tras la administración de atropina durante una ecocardiografía de esfuerzo / Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia After Atropine Use During Stress Echocardiography

No disponible